ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Further strategies after immune checkpoint inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: salvage treatments and consolidation with transplantation, experience in daily clinical practice.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engraftment syndrome after PD-1 blockade in classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated by autologous stem cell transplantation.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Engraftment Syndrome Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in a Patient Receiving Nivolumab as Salvage TherapyTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) emerged as an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, many patients lose their response to CPIs. To improve outcomes in this setting, two strategies can be considered: salvage chemotherapy (CHT) for those with an unsatisfactory response, and autologous stem-cell transplantation (auto-SCT) as a consolidation for patients with at least partial response (PR).We analyzed retrospectively the effectiveness in terms of rate of response and survivals of these two approaches in cohort 1 (salvage CHT) and in cohort 2 (auto-SCT consolidation). Adverse events were also assessed.A total of 45 heavily pre-treated patients were analyzed (median of 4 prior therapies; 93.3% refractory to the last therapy). Thirty patients received further CHT at a median of 32 days (range 1-1213) after CPI Fifteen patients in cohort 2 underwent auto-SCT, with 8 in complete response (CR) and 7 in PR. In cohort 1 a final overall response rate (ORR) of 50.0% with a median progression-free survival of 24.6 months. In cohort 2, the ORR was 93.3% (all CR) with median survivals not reached. No unexpected or cumulative toxicities were observed.Our findings suggest that auto-SCT is an effective consolidation strategy for cHL patients who achieve at least a PR after CPI therapy, despite multiple prior lines of treatment. Additionally, CPIs treatment appears to sensitize heavily pre-treated and chemorefractory patients to subsequent chemotherapy, potentially facilitating successful transplant consolidation and improving the chances of cure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.