Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025194›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Natural language processing of electronic health records for early detection of cognitive decline: a systematic review.

Ravi Shankar, Anjali Bundele, Amartya Mukhopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ravi ShankarMedical Affairs - Research Innovation & Enterprise, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. Ravi_SHANKAR@nuhs.edu.sg.
Anjali BundeleMedical Affairs - Research Innovation & Enterprise, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Amartya MukhopadhyayDivision of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review evaluated natural language processing (NLP) approaches for detecting cognitive impairment in electronic health record clinical notes. Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 18 studies (n = 1,064,530) that employed rule-based algorithms (67%), traditional machine learning (28%), and deep learning (17%). NLP models demonstrated robust performance in identifying cognitive decline, with median sensitivity 0.88 (IQR 0.74-0.91) and specificity 0.96 (IQR 0.81-0.99). Deep learning architectures achieved superior results, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves up to 0.997. Major implementation challenges included incomplete electronic health record data capture, inconsistent clinical documentation practices, and limited external validation. While NLP demonstrates promise, successful clinical translation requires establishing standardized approaches, improving access to annotated datasets, and developing equitable deployment frameworks.

Identifiers

PMID40025194
PMCPMC11873039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.