Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025172›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2025

Modulating neuroplasticity for chronic pain relief: noninvasive neuromodulation as a promising approach.

Nishani Jayanika Jayathilake, Tien Thuy Phan, Jeongsook Kim, Kyu Pil Lee, Joo Min Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Neuromodulation of the central nervous system for facial pain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nishani Jayanika Jayathilake *Department of Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-7334
Tien Thuy Phan *Center for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jeongsook Kim *Department of Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Pil LeeDepartment of Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. leekyupil@gmail.com.
Joo Min ParkCenter for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. joominp@ibs.re.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-2759

Funding

Institute for Basic Science (IBS) IBS-R001-D2Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF) KIMST-20220128National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2024-00348893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic neuropathic pain is a debilitating neuroplastic disorder that notably impacts the quality of life of millions of people worldwide. This complex condition, encompassing various manifestations, such as sciatica, diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia, arises from nerve damage or malfunctions in pain processing pathways and involves various biological, physiological and psychological processes. Maladaptive neuroplasticity, known as central sensitization, plays a critical role in the persistence of chronic neuropathic pain. Current treatments for neuropathic pain include pharmacological interventions (for example, antidepressants and anticonvulsants), invasive procedures (for example, deep brain stimulation) and physical therapies. However, these approaches often have limitations and potential side effects. In light of these challenges, interest in noninvasive neuromodulation techniques as alternatives or complementary treatments for neuropathic pain is increasing. These methods aim to induce analgesia while reversing maladaptive plastic changes, offering potential advantages over conventional pharmacological practices and invasive methods. Recent technological advancements have spurred the exploration of noninvasive neuromodulation therapies, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial ultrasound stimulation, as well as innovative transformations of invasive techniques into noninvasive methods at both the preclinical and clinical levels. Here this review aims to critically examine the mechanisms of maladaptive neuroplasticity in chronic neuropathic pain and evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive neuromodulation techniques in pain relief. By focusing on optimizing these techniques, we can better assess their short-term and long-term effects, refine treatment variables and ultimately improve the quality of neuropathic pain management.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNeuralgiaNeuronal PlasticityPain ManagementAnimalsDeep Brain StimulationHumansTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40025172
PMCPMC11958754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.