ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatiotemporal survival analysis for movement trajectory tracking in virtual reality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming language research from classic desktops to virtual environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a novel method for analyzing response trajectory tracking data. Limiting behavioral experiments to discrete, key-press response measures, such as reaction times and accuracy, is unsatisfactory for observing the ongoing dynamics of cognition. We assessed the utility of continuous response tracking in Virtual Reality (VR) by comparing it to key-press responses in a classical N-back matching task. For elucidatory purposes, in both classical and VR versions of the task we first worked through analyses of discrete measures, before drawing information from the continuous trajectory tracking data in VR. Classical ANOVAs reproduced effects of visual working memory load in an N-back task. Violations of ANOVA assumptions suggested effects were buried in the noise; some of these were revealed in subsequent survival analyses, namely frequency neglect (a strong preference for match responses despite the infrequency of this response category) in the fast responses and category frequency-tuned response in the slow responses. Spatiotemporal survival analysis (StSA), our newly proposed method of analyzing response trajectories, revealed that all these effects also occur in the VR conditions. In addition, initial divergences towards the wrong responses were corrected later in the course of trajectories in the non-Match trials. While the StSA method is theory-free and can be used for exploratory purposes, we present examples of hypothesis testing in StSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.