Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced slope stability prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques.

Devendra Kumar Yadav, Swarup Chattopadhyay, Debi Prasad Tripathy, Pragyan Mishra, Pritiranjan Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Devendra Kumar YadavSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, XIM University, Bhubaneswar, 752050, Odisha, India. devenya2091@gmail.com.
Swarup ChattopadhyaySchool of Computer Science and Engineering, XIM University, Bhubaneswar, 752050, Odisha, India.
Debi Prasad TripathyDepartment of Mining Engineering, NIT, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.
Pragyan MishraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, NIT, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.
Pritiranjan SinghDepartment of Mining Engineering, NIT, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate prediction of slope stability is a challenging research endeavor, particularly in real-world environments. This study presents a machine learning (ML) model for evaluating slope stability that meets high precision and speed criteria in slope engineering. The goal of this study is to build an ensemble machine learning model that can accurately predict slope stability from both a classification and a regression point of view. We proposed here an ensemble bagging and boosting technique with appropriate base classifiers to substantiate the assertion. We improved the slope stability prediction models through random cross-validation by selecting seven quantitative parameters based on 125 data points. From a classification model perspective, the best slope prediction accuracy (>90%) was attained by bagging with base classifier Decision Tree (DT), boosting with base classifier Random Forest (RF), and random forest with splitting criterion Gini-index. The ensemble classifier has attained an average enhancement of 8-10% in accuracy value compared to base classifiers. From the standpoint of a regression model, ensemble bagging regression enhances the average [Formula: see text] value by 8-10% relative to the conventional base regression models employed in this study. Six-dimensional reduction techniques were used to examine and illustrate potential data aggregation in the prediction of slope stability. We found that RF and ensemble bagging, when combined with the base classifier DT model, are the most superior and accurate models for predicting slope stability. We also found that these two models are robust in predicting slope stability, outperforming others with an average improvement of 6-8% in accuracy, even after reducing dimensions. The findings offer a fresh method for geotechnical engineering slope stability prediction. Experimental evaluation suggests that in terms of prediction accuracy, the ensemble bagging model is the most effective method for evaluating and predicting the stability of slopes.

Indexed as

Ensemble classifiersFactor of safetyMachine learningRegressionSlope stability

Identifiers

PMID40025161
PMCPMC11873044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.