ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced slope stability prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Slope stability prediction via TrAdaBoost transfer learning: integrating physics and data into a double-driven framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting the mechanical behavior of municipal solid waste layers in the Barmshour Landfill stability analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Delineating homogeneous zones for rock joint wall mechanical properties in open-pit mine slope based on a multi-indicator stacked generalization model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning surrogate models for slope stability prediction using AI techniques: a case study of the Meizhou landslide.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis and comprehensive evaluation of dam safety monitoring at Silin hydropower station.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate prediction of slope stability is a challenging research endeavor, particularly in real-world environments. This study presents a machine learning (ML) model for evaluating slope stability that meets high precision and speed criteria in slope engineering. The goal of this study is to build an ensemble machine learning model that can accurately predict slope stability from both a classification and a regression point of view. We proposed here an ensemble bagging and boosting technique with appropriate base classifiers to substantiate the assertion. We improved the slope stability prediction models through random cross-validation by selecting seven quantitative parameters based on 125 data points. From a classification model perspective, the best slope prediction accuracy (>90%) was attained by bagging with base classifier Decision Tree (DT), boosting with base classifier Random Forest (RF), and random forest with splitting criterion Gini-index. The ensemble classifier has attained an average enhancement of 8-10% in accuracy value compared to base classifiers. From the standpoint of a regression model, ensemble bagging regression enhances the average [Formula: see text] value by 8-10% relative to the conventional base regression models employed in this study. Six-dimensional reduction techniques were used to examine and illustrate potential data aggregation in the prediction of slope stability. We found that RF and ensemble bagging, when combined with the base classifier DT model, are the most superior and accurate models for predicting slope stability. We also found that these two models are robust in predicting slope stability, outperforming others with an average improvement of 6-8% in accuracy, even after reducing dimensions. The findings offer a fresh method for geotechnical engineering slope stability prediction. Experimental evaluation suggests that in terms of prediction accuracy, the ensemble bagging model is the most effective method for evaluating and predicting the stability of slopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.