ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk assessment of land subsidence in Shanghai municipality based on AHP and EWM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A methodological design and an empirical study for assessing the maturity of an UASR based on the AHP-EWM and the FSEM fusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and application of advanced learning models for predicting the land subsidence due to coal mining.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developing an element system of hospital resilience to medical run in major emerging infectious diseases: a Delphi study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban land subsidence (LS) results in a reduction in ground elevation, compromising infrastructure integrity, disrupting the hydrological cycle, and posing significant risks to economic, demographic, and environmental security. This phenomenon is characterized by a certain degree of latency. In recent years, as Shanghai has undergone rapid urban expansion and high-density development, the issue of LS has become increasingly pronounced. This study employs a multi-criteria decision analysis framework, integrating advanced technologies such as Remote Sensing (RS), Google Earth Engine (GEE), and Small Baseline Subset Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SBAS-InSAR), to develop a comprehensive evaluation index system comprising fifteen indicators, which consider geological, hydrological, and anthropogenic factors. By applying matrix theory, the study utilizes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Entropy Weight Method (EWM) to integrate subjective and objective weights, thereby determining the comprehensive weight for each indicator. Subsequently, the comprehensive natural disaster risk theory was employed to assess the risk levels across different regions within the study area, which were visualized using ArcGIS. The study area was classified into five risk categories: very low, low, medium, high, and very high, comprising 67.00%, 17.87%, 9.25%, 3.39%, and 2.48% of the total area, respectively. The results closely align with historical cumulative subsidence data and the current LS prevention map of Shanghai, confirming the validity and efficacy of the selected indicators and evaluation methodologies. The findings suggest that the overall risk level in the study area is relatively low, with high-risk zones concentrated in densely populated and economically urbanized central districts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.