Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025136›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Image steganalysis using active learning and hyperparameter optimization.

Li Bohang, Ningxin Li, Jing Yang, Osama Alfarraj, Fahad Albelhai, Amr Tolba, Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Paweł Pławiak, Por Lip Yee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Li BohangData science, Shopee, Singapore, 118265, Singapore.
Ningxin LiFu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia University, New York, 10027, USA.
Jing YangDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. s2147529@siswa.um.edu.my.
Osama AlfarrajComputer Science Department, Community College, King Saud University, 11437, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlbelhaiComputer Science Department, Community College, King Saud University, 11437, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amr TolbaComputer Science Department, Community College, King Saud University, 11437, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zaffar Ahmed ShaikhDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari, Karachi, 75660, Pakistan.
Roohallah AlizadehsaniInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI) Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.
Paweł PławiakDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155, Krakow, Poland. pawel.plawiak@pk.edu.pl.
Por Lip YeeDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image steganalysis, detecting hidden data in digital images, is essential for enhancing digital security. Traditional steganalysis methods typically rely on large, pre-labeled image datasets, which are difficult and costly to compile. To address this, this paper introduces an innovative approach that combines active learning and off-policy Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to improve image steganalysis with minimal labeled data. Active learning allows the model to intelligently choose which unlabeled images should be annotated, thus reducing the amount of labeled data needed for effective training. Traditional active learning strategies often use static selection methods that restrict flexibility and do not adjust well to dynamic environments. To overcome this, our method incorporates off-policy DRL for strategic data selection. The off-policy in DRL can increase sample efficiency and significantly enhance learning outcomes. We also use the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm to fine-tune the hyperparameters of the model, reducing its sensitivity to different settings and ensuring more stable results. Our testing on the extensive BossBase 1.01 and BOWS-2 datasets demonstrates the robust ability of the approach to distinguish between unaltered and steganographic images, achieving an average F-measure of 93.152% on BossBase 1.01 and 91.834% on the BOWS-2 dataset. In summary, this research enhances digital security by employing advanced image steganalysis to detect hidden data, significantly improving detection accuracy with minimal labeled data.

Indexed as

Active learningConvolutional neural networkDifferential evolutionImage steganalysisReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40025136
PMCPMC11873224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.