ArticleScientific reports2025
Image steganalysis using active learning and hyperparameter optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantum-enhanced federated blockchain for privacy-preserving cardiovascular intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive malware identification via integrated SimCLR and GRU networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image steganalysis, detecting hidden data in digital images, is essential for enhancing digital security. Traditional steganalysis methods typically rely on large, pre-labeled image datasets, which are difficult and costly to compile. To address this, this paper introduces an innovative approach that combines active learning and off-policy Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to improve image steganalysis with minimal labeled data. Active learning allows the model to intelligently choose which unlabeled images should be annotated, thus reducing the amount of labeled data needed for effective training. Traditional active learning strategies often use static selection methods that restrict flexibility and do not adjust well to dynamic environments. To overcome this, our method incorporates off-policy DRL for strategic data selection. The off-policy in DRL can increase sample efficiency and significantly enhance learning outcomes. We also use the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm to fine-tune the hyperparameters of the model, reducing its sensitivity to different settings and ensuring more stable results. Our testing on the extensive BossBase 1.01 and BOWS-2 datasets demonstrates the robust ability of the approach to distinguish between unaltered and steganographic images, achieving an average F-measure of 93.152% on BossBase 1.01 and 91.834% on the BOWS-2 dataset. In summary, this research enhances digital security by employing advanced image steganalysis to detect hidden data, significantly improving detection accuracy with minimal labeled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.