Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025126›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced automated art curation using supervised modified CNN for art style classification.

Weiwei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Weiwei LiSchool of Art and Design, Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng, 475001, Henan, China. 2007820665@yrcti.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the application of a supervised Modified Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for automated art classification and curation. Traditional art classification methods rely heavily on human expertise, which is time-consuming, subjective, and inconsistent. To address these challenges, we developed a Modified CNN model capable of distinguishing art styles and movements using features such as color patterns, textures, and compositions. The model was trained and evaluated on a custom dataset comprising 5000 artworks representing five major art styles: Impressionism, Cubism, Realism, Abstract, and Surrealism. The Modified CNN achieved an average classification accuracy of 93.0%, surpassing existing models such as ResNet50 and VGG16 in precision (93.5%), recall (92.8%), and F1-score (93.1%). Feature visualization using t-SNE and PCA highlighted the model's ability to cluster distinct styles while identifying overlaps in challenging categories such as Abstract and Surrealism. Grad-CAM heatmaps provided insights into regions contributing to incorrect predictions, revealing opportunities for refinement. Despite its strong performance, the model faced limitations, including biases in training data and overlapping stylistic features. Future work aims to expand datasets, incorporate multimodal inputs, and improve interpretability using explainable AI techniques. This research demonstrates the potential of Modified CNNs as a scalable and consistent tool for art classification, with applications in digital curation, art education, and cultural preservation.

Indexed as

Art classificationArt movementsArt stylesAutomated curationDeep learningDigital curationFeature extractionMachine learningModified CNN

Identifiers

PMID40025126
PMCPMC11873298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.