ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced automated art curation using supervised modified CNN for art style classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artistic style classification in traditional cultural heritage using convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Visual perception based deep learning transformers for classifying paintings and photographs through feature extraction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cultural memory semiotics and function behavior structure model for digital inheritance and innovation in AI generated Huizhou woodcarving images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An art style classification network integrating contrastive learning and counterfactual attention.PloS one · 2026Article
- Preserving and enhancing cultural heritage through art design using feature pyramid network optimized by modified builder optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated grading of embroidery assignments: a multi-region deep learning framework with ResNet-50.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Oil-Painting Style Classification Using ResNet with Conditional Information Bottleneck Regularization.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the application of a supervised Modified Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for automated art classification and curation. Traditional art classification methods rely heavily on human expertise, which is time-consuming, subjective, and inconsistent. To address these challenges, we developed a Modified CNN model capable of distinguishing art styles and movements using features such as color patterns, textures, and compositions. The model was trained and evaluated on a custom dataset comprising 5000 artworks representing five major art styles: Impressionism, Cubism, Realism, Abstract, and Surrealism. The Modified CNN achieved an average classification accuracy of 93.0%, surpassing existing models such as ResNet50 and VGG16 in precision (93.5%), recall (92.8%), and F1-score (93.1%). Feature visualization using t-SNE and PCA highlighted the model's ability to cluster distinct styles while identifying overlaps in challenging categories such as Abstract and Surrealism. Grad-CAM heatmaps provided insights into regions contributing to incorrect predictions, revealing opportunities for refinement. Despite its strong performance, the model faced limitations, including biases in training data and overlapping stylistic features. Future work aims to expand datasets, incorporate multimodal inputs, and improve interpretability using explainable AI techniques. This research demonstrates the potential of Modified CNNs as a scalable and consistent tool for art classification, with applications in digital curation, art education, and cultural preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.