ArticleScientific reports2025
A cautionary note on the potential pitfalls of using N-terminal truncated CD63 to label small extracellular vesicles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EV-SPEC: Decoding the Spatial Proteomic Signature of the Extracellular Vesicle Corona.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- The Fatty Acid Transporter CD36 Mediates Uptake, Biodistribution, and Cardioprotection by Small Extracellular Vesicles From HEK293 Cells.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Exploring the therapeutic potential of MSC-derived secretomes in neonatal care: focus on BPD and NEC.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small extracellular vesicles (sEV) are nanosized vesicles that facilitate intracellular communication. A significant research obstacle is the isolation of sEV devoid of non-sEV contaminants. Immunoaffinity capture with sEV-specific antibodies is an attractive approach to purifying sEV, but it risks disrupting the vesicles during antibody dissociation. Furthermore, immunoaffinity capture may require the modification of EV-specific proteins for the incorporation of tags on the EV surface, with unknown implications on EV production and function. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a previously reported CD63 truncation is efficient for the incorporation of small tags on the extravesicular surface. We therefore conjugated ALFA-tag to N-terminal-truncated CD63, and included nanoluciferase at the C-terminus, for luminescent tracing of the sEV. Full-length CD63-nanoluciferase was used as a control. Plasmid constructs expressing these proteins were transfected into HEK293 cells. In contrast to a previous report, the N-terminal truncation of CD63 impaired its membrane localisation and reduced the yield of EVs. Further investigation revealed that some of the tagged CD63 was co-localized with aggresomes and was preferentially secreted from the cells as soluble protein rather than being associated with sEV. These results demonstrate that CD63 truncation can impair its function and EV yield, potentially generating misleading results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.