ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical efficacy and safety of a new single-incision axillary vein puncture technique for totally implantable venous access ports.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative safety outcomes of three venous access routes for totally implantable venous access port placement and exploratory assessment of pre-removal catheter-related thrombosis in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Effects of totally implantable venous access ports on complications and quality of life in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-guided axillary vein versus internal jugular vein access for totally implantable venous access ports in breast cancer: a retrospective comparison of patient-reported outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the clinical efficacy of a new single-incision axillary vein puncture technique for implanting totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). A retrospective review of patient data from January 2023 to June 2023 at The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University was conducted. The study included adult patients with solid malignancies scheduled for intravenous chemotherapy and TIVAPs implantation. Patients were categorized into single-incision group (Group S) and dual-incision group (Group D) based on different venous access approaches. Baseline information, primary tumors, immediate adverse events, indwelling time, and early and late adverse events were collected. A total of 338 patients were included in the analysis, with 117 in Group S. and 221 in Group D. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The technical success rate was 99.1% in Group S and 98.6% in Group D, demonstrating similarity. The mean operative time was 26 min in Group S, significantly shorter than the 36 min in Group D (p < 0.05). Group D experienced more occurrences of localised ecchymosis and painful. Overall, Group S exhibited superiority over Group D in terms of immediate adverse events (p < 0.05). Follow-up data revealed comparable adverse events rates between the two groups. In conclusion, the study indicates that the single-incision axillary vein puncture technique can be safely implemented by an experienced team with a low incidence of adverse events. This approach can serve as a valuable alternative for clinical TIVAPs placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.