Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025077›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Oncofertility Barriers in Nurses Caring for Women with Breast Cancer.

Li Hu, Chaoting Zheng, Binbin Xu, Wei Tang, Hong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li HuThe Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Chaoting ZhengThe Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Binbin XuSchool of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Wei TangThe Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Hong LiThe Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China. 121746159@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of oncofertility care in supporting women coping with fertility challenges after breast cancer, the practice of oncofertility care among nurses remains suboptimal. There is an urgent need to investigate oncofertility barriers faced by nurses caring for women with breast cancer. A cross-sectional online study was conducted among registered nurses caring for women with breast cancer. A self-developed questionnaire and the Oncofertility Barriers Scale (OBS) were used to assess participants' characteristics and self-perceived barriers. A score ≥ 3 indicates a high level of oncofertility barriers requiring further attention. 372 nurses completed the survey, with 45.54% reporting a score of ≥ 3 on the OBS. Notably, 85% of participants reported high levels of barriers in at least one domain and 27.42% reported barriers in all six domains of the scale. The most commonly reported barrier was "Stereotype of cancer patients" (71%). Nurses without fertility training, those who did not read fertility-related guidelines, and those in departments lacking such guidelines reported significantly higher barriers (all p < 0.05). The prevalence of oncofertility barriers among nurses is high. Educational programs should be developed to address these barriers, improving the quality of oncofertility care for women with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFertility PreservationNursesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerNurseOncofertility barriers

Identifiers

PMID40025077
PMCPMC11873059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.