Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025065›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait.

Amrizal Muhammad Nur, Syed Mohamed Aljunid, Eleni L Tolma, Mahmoud Annaka, Rihab Alwotayan, Amani Elbasmi, Walid Q Alali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amrizal Muhammad NurPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. amrizal65@gmail.com.
Syed Mohamed AljunidDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Eleni L TolmaDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Mahmoud AnnakaDepartment of International Health Relations, Kuwait Ministry of Health, Shuwaikh, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Rihab AlwotayanDepartment of International Health Relations, Kuwait Ministry of Health, Shuwaikh, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Amani ElbasmiUnit of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer Control Center, Kuwait Ministry of Health, Shuwaikh, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Walid Q AlaliDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant health challenge in Kuwait, ranking as the second most common cancer with the incidence rate 13.2 cases per 100,000 people in year 2019. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods in Kuwait from the perspective of Kuwait's healthcare providers. Using a Decision Tree Analysis Model, the study compared three screening modalities: Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) followed by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy alone, sigmoidoscopy alone and alongside no screening. Over a 10-year period post-diagnosis, the model tracked costs and outcomes based on CRC patients' life expectancy, expressing results using Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs). Colorectal cancer screening using FOBT followed by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy resulted in 7.7 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of USD 3,573. In contrast, no screening achieved 7.2 QALYs but was more expensive, costing USD 4,084. Screening with only sigmoidoscopy or only colonoscopy provided 6.8 QALYs each, at costs of USD 4,905 and USD 5,002, respectively. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainties in cost and outcome estimates. FOBT followed by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy can be considered as an efficient and effective approach towards early detection of CRC. This approach can be used by healthcare policymakers in Kuwait, in the development of population-based CRC screening programs to optimize resource allocation and improve public health outcomes.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningAgedColonoscopyCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDecision TreesFemaleHumansKuwaitMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSigmoidoscopyColonoscopyColorectal cancerCost-effectivenessFecal occult blood testingSigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40025065
PMCPMC11873134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.