Trial reportScientific reports2025
The autonomic response following taVNS predicts changes in level of consciousness in DoC patients.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awakening the Vagus: Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation-A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation for Brain Fatigue: From Real-Time Biomarkers to Adaptive Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multimodal Assessment of Consciousness with Brain-Computer Interfaces and Artificial Intelligence: From Acquired Brain Injury to Neurodegenerative Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long-term HRV metrics may assist in differentiating between prolonged disorders of consciousness and emergence from minimally conscious state : a cross-sectional study.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis on the effect of vagus nerve stimulation in reducing post-operative inflammation and enhancing recovery outcomes after surgery.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a narrative review of neurophysiological mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future directions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Short-term changes in CRS-R scores during transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a single-arm exploratory study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Non-invasive neuroregulation techniques applied to patients with consciousness disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Autonomic heart rate variability trends predict outcome in disorders of consciousness.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in emergency medicine and critical care have significantly improved survival rates for patients with severe acquired brain injuries(sABI), subsequently increasing the prevalence of disorders of consciousness (DoC) such as Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS) and Minimally Conscious State (MCS). However, the assessment of conscious states relies on the observation of behavioral responses, the interpretation of which may vary from evaluator to evaluator, as well as the high rate of misdiagnosis, which together pose significant challenges for clinical diagnosis. The study investigates the utility of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in modulating autonomic responses, as evidenced through heart rate variability (HRV), for distinguishing between healthy individuals and DoC patients and for prognosticating patient outcomes. A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from Februry 9, 2022, to February 4, 2024, at Hangzhou Armed Police Hospital in China. Healthy controls (HC) and DoC patients were enrolled in this study. The taVNS was administered to each subject for ten minutes. There electrocardiogram (ECG) signals were recorded for the analysis of HRV both during the stimulation and the ten minutes of rest that preceded and followed the stimulation. Subsequent investigations utilized Support Vector Machine (SVM) modeling, enhanced by a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel, to explore potential predictors of patient outcomes. This approach aimed to differentiate HC from DoC and MCS from UWS patients. 26 HC and 36 patients diagnosed with DoC were included in the analysis,. The DoC group consisted of 17 patients with a diagnosis of MCS and 19 with diagnosis of UWS/VS. Significant modulations in HRV parameters (HF, VLF, SampEn) were observed, indicating variations in autonomic response between the control group and DoC patients. Using the VLF, LF, and SampEn features in SVM model, DoC and HC were correctly classified with an accuracy of 86%. Similarly, MCS and UWS were classified with an accuracy of 78%. The SVM modeling achieved an 86% accuracy rate in predicting outcomes three months post-intervention, with a 71% confirmation rate at six months.The results highlight taVNS's potential as a therapeutic modality in managing DoC by demonstrating its impact on autonomic regulation and suggesting pathways for enhancing recovery, which accentuates the significance of exploring brain-heart dynamics in DoC, presenting a novel approach to therapeutic strategies. Trial Registration Information: URL: chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100045161. Date of the first registration: 9th/ April/ 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.