ArticleScientific reports2025
Discrepancies in precipitation trends between observational and reanalysis datasets in the Amazon Basin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tree ring isotopes reveal an intensification of the hydrological cycle in the Amazon.Communications earth & environment · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Amazon rainforest is a region of global importance as it accounts for 10% of terrestrial biodiversity and stores at least 10 years' worth of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) emissions. However, the rainforest is currently under tremendous pressure from deforestation and the impacts of climate change, leading to rainforest degradation and perturbations of the regional carbon and water cycles. Using data sets from various sources, we produce spatial and temporal analyses of precipitation for the Amazon Basin from 1980 to 2022. Results demonstrate substantial seasonal and regional variations across the Amazon Basin, indicating that while some regions are experiencing increasing trends in precipitation, others are undergoing declines. These trends are not consistent among available datasets, with substantial differences between observational, reanalysis, and climate model data. For example, precipitation data from reanalyses for 1980-2022 reveal significant drying patterns in the southern and central Amazon during the dry season, which are not present in the observational datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.