ArticleScientific reports2025
A privacy-preserving dependable deep federated learning model for identifying new infections from genome sequences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional molecular-based identification (TMID) technique of new infections from genome sequences (GSs) has made significant contributions so far. However, due to the sensitive nature of the medical data, the TMID technique of transferring the patient's data to the central machine or server may create severe privacy and security issues. In recent years, the progression of deep federated learning (DFL) and its remarkable success in many domains has guided as a potential solution in this field. Therefore, we proposed a dependable and privacy-preserving DFL-based identification model of new infections from GSs. The unique contributions include automatic effective feature selection, which is best suited for identifying new infections, designing a dependable and privacy-preserving DFL-based LeNet model, and evaluating real-world data. To this end, a comprehensive experimental performance evaluation has been conducted. Our proposed model has an overall accuracy of 99.12% after independently and identically distributing the dataset among six clients. Moreover, the proposed model has a precision of 98.23%, recall of 98.04%, f1-score of 96.24%, Cohen's kappa of 83.94%, and ROC AUC of 98.24% for the same configuration, which is a noticeable improvement when compared to the other benchmark models. The proposed dependable model, along with empirical results, is encouraging enough to recognize as an alternative for identifying new infections from other virus strains by ensuring proper privacy and security of patients' data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.