SynthesisClinical oral investigations2025
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of mini-implant-retained maxillary and mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of overdentures and their retaining dental mini-implants, based on a single-arm systematic literature review.
methodsElectronic search was undertaken in three databases, last updated in October 2023, plus manual search of journals. Cumulative implant survival rate (CSR) and the estimated marginal bone loss (MBL) under different follow-up times were calculated.
resultsThirty-nine studies were included, with 3,787 mini-implants supporting 1,026 overdentures (109 maxilla, 896 mandible) in 1,005 patients, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 19.8 months (min-max 0.3-84.0). 202 mini-implants failed, after a mean of 9.4 ± 11.8 months (7-year CSR 91.4%). The implant survival was lower in the maxilla in comparison to the mandible (p < 0.001), lower for early/delayed-loaded in comparison to immediately-loaded implants (p = 0.005) and lower for 2-mini-implant in comparison to 4-mini-implant-retained mandibular overdenture (p < 0.001; Log-rank test). A high rate of transversal fracture of the prosthesis and wear of the attachment parts was observed. The estimated mean MBL gradually increased from 0.518 (≤ 6 months) to 1.260 mm (58.8-90 months). There was an estimated MBL increase of 0.011 mm per additional month of follow-up.
conclusionAlthough presenting a high 7-year CSR, mini-implant-retained overdentures may require frequent maintenance follow-ups, due to the high rate of technical complications. The estimated MBL of mini-implants over 80 months is low. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ability to anticipate outcomes is an essential part of risk management in clinical practice. The findings reported herein set some recommendations and potential strategies for minimizing failures and complications commonly associated with this mini-implant-retained overdentures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.