Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40024971›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025

Computed tomography-based navigation versus accelerometer-based portable navigation in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hip osteoarthritis.

Shinya Tanaka, Yusuke Osawa, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroto Funahashi, Hiroaki Ido, Takamune Asamoto, Shiro Imagama

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shinya TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan.
Yusuke OsawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan. ysk0568@yahoo.co.jp.
Yasuhiko TakegamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan.
Hiroto FunahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan.
Hiroaki IdoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan.
Takamune AsamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan.
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya-shi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate cup placement is challenging in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for dysplastic hip osteoarthritis (DHOA) because of the complex morphology of the acetabulum. Studies have reported good accuracy for total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computed tomography-based navigation (CTN); however, in recent years, portable navigation (PN) has become more widely applied because of its low cost and ease of use. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of portable navigation with that of CT-based navigation.

methodsA total of 114 patients underwent THA for DHOA via the standard posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position using the CTN (CTN-THA group) or PN (PN-THA group) system. After propensity score matching, 32 patients were included in each group. The accuracy of cup inclination, anteversion, cup placement position, and operative time were compared between the groups.

resultsThere was no difference in accuracy error between the CTN-THA (inclination 2.8 ± 2.0° and anteversion 3.4 ± 2.1°) and PN-THA groups (inclination 2.5 ± 1.8° and anteversion 2.6 ± 2.2°). The CTN-THA group (inclination 2.2 ± 2.0° and anteversion 2.1 ± 1.6°) achieved better navigation error compared to the PN-THA group (inclination 2.6 ± 2.2° and anteversion 3.8 ± 3.3°). The error of cup placement position in the anteroposterior direction was significantly larger in the PN-THA group (4.27 ± 3.02 mm) than in the CTN-THA group (2.13 ± 2.17 mm). The operative time was significantly longer in the CTN-THA group (115 ± 41 min) than in the PN-THA group (87 ± 19 min).

conclusionsCTN-THA exhibited better accuracy than PN-THA for both cup placement angles and positions. CTN-THA tended to increase the operative time compared to PN-THA.

Indexed as

AccelerometryArthroplasty, Replacement, HipOsteoarthritis, HipSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Navigation SystemsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcetabulumAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesAcetabular cup orientationComputer-assisted surgeryCT-based navigation systemHip osteoarthritisPortable imageless navigation systemTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40024971
PMCPMC11872758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.