ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
An Esophageal Luminal Diameter of 16 mm Predicts Dysphagia Resolution in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blind-Ending Esophageal Fistula Complicating Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Case Report and Up-to-Date Strategy from Diagnosis to Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GOALS AND
backgroundEosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory esophageal disorder, often complicated by strictures requiring dilation. There is limited information on the target esophageal luminal diameter (ELD) post-treatment to relieve symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the ELD threshold associated with dysphagia resolution in EoE patients in histologic remission. STUDY: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult EoE patients with a stricture in histologic remission. Patients were excluded if symptoms, EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS), and ELD were missing. ELD was estimated by dilator diameter, endoscope passage, or functional lumen imaging probe. Symptoms, demographics, EREFS, and histology were recorded. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. The ELD threshold for dysphagia was determined using receiver operating characteristics analyses.
resultsOf the 76 patients who met criteria, 63 (82.9%) reported dysphagia. For every one-millimeter decrease in ELD, there was an increased odds of having dysphagia (OR 9.12, 95% CI 33.4, p < 0.001). The threshold ELD for having dysphagia was less than 16 mm (sensitivity: 96.8%, specificity: 92.3%). In a subcohort analysis of patients who were dilated (n = 58, 76.3%), the main predictor for persistent dysphagia post-dilation was the pre-dilation ELD (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.87, p < 0.001).
conclusionA decrease in ELD is associated with a higher odds of dysphagia in EoE patients in histologic remission. ELD of 16 mm or greater provided the strongest threshold for which symptoms were absent. This may present a reasonable dilation target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.