Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40024944›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025

Outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of implant-related, radiographic, and demographic factors influencing durability and revision rates.

Felix Hochberger, Benedikt Weth, Tizian Heinz, Dirk Boehm, Maximillian Rudert, Kilian List

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felix HochbergerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstr 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Benedikt WethDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstr 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Tizian HeinzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstr 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Dirk BoehmDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstr 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Maximillian RudertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstr 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Kilian ListDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstr 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany. kilian.rueckl@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of implant-associated and radiographic factors on survival rates and revisions of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsThis retrospective study included 68 patients who underwent TSA for primary OA at a single institution between 2008 and 2015, with a minimum follow-up of 60 months. Patients with prior shoulder surgeries, perioperative infections, or revisions within 12 months postoperatively were excluded. Patients were divided into Group A (Survivors) and Group B (Revisions) based on implant survival. Radiographic parameters analyzed included critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromiohumeral distance (AHD), lateral offset (LO), humeral head-stem index (HSI), centre of rotation (COR), and glenoid erosion, categorized using Sirveaux, Lévigne, Franceschi, and Walch classifications. Demographic data were also assessed.

resultsOf 68 patients, 57 were in Group A (mean age: 58.5 ± 10.1 years; follow-up: 115.8 months) and 11 in Group B (mean age: 61.4 ± 8.3 years; follow-up: 113.9 months). Implant survival was 84% after 115.8 ± 34.5 months. Baseline demographics were comparable (e.g., smoking: p = 0.75), as was osteolysis prevalence (Group A: 47%; Group B: 45%; p = 0.91). HSI was significantly higher in Group B (0.5 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.1; p = 0.03). No other radiographic differences were significant.

conclusionPatients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can expect favourable mid- to long-term outcomes, with implant survival rates of 84% and relatively low complication rates. Although osteolysis is common, it rarely necessitates revision surgery. The role of the humeral head-stem index (HSI) warrants further investigation. STUDY

designLevel IV; retrospective case study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderOsteoarthritisShoulder JointShoulder ProsthesisAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis FailureRadiographyReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFollow-up assessmentHead-stem indexOsteolysisShoulder prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID40024944
PMCPMC12003502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.