SynthesisAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2025
Outcomes of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Management of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts.
Synthesis in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer patients with concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Short-term outcomes of multi-arm uniportal robotic thoracic surgery versus uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of perioperative hospital stay, postoperative chest tube retention, pain levels between uniportal and multiportal thoracoscopic lung cancer resection patients.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Uniportal VATS for anatomical lung resection: 15 years of innovation.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Surgical Safety of Uniportal versus Multiportal VATS Segmentectomy during Institutional Adoption: Differential Impact by Lobar Location.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026Article
- Feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with the da Vinci Xi surgical system: technical modifications and practical guidance.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Article
- The impact of liposomal bupivacaine erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and early functional recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Tips and tricks of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery complex segmentectomy.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
- Postoperative pain outcomes following uniportal vs. multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) has been increasingly adopted for lung cancer management. This study aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of UVATS versus multiportal VATS (MVATS).
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted on electronic databases. Perioperative outcomes evaluated were postoperative complications, conversion to open thoracotomy, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores on postoperative days 1 (POD1) and 3 (POD3). The oncological outcomes assessed were total lymph nodes retrieved. Individual patient time-to-event data were estimated from published Kaplan-Meier curves.
resultsThe analysis demonstrated that UVATS was associated with significantly lower postoperative complications (relative risk [RR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-0.91; p = 0.002), lower VAS scores on POD1(MD: -0.44; 95% CI: -0.70, -0.17; p = 0.001) and POD3 (MD: 0.76; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.36; p <0.001) compared to MVATS. Although UVATS had a lower conversion rate, this difference was not statistically significant (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.33-1.18; p = 0.15). MVATS retrieved a higher number of lymph nodes, but this difference was also not statistically significant (MD: 0.6; 95% CI: -1.39, 0.12, p = 0.1). The overall survival probability at 96 months was slightly higher in the MVATS group (82.49%) compared to the UVATS group (75.89%), with a p-value of 0.5. Disease-free survival was comparable between the groups (75.43% UVATS and 74.74% MVATS, p = 0.59).
conclusionUVATS demonstrated favorable perioperative outcomes and comparable oncological efficacy to MVATS in the management of lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.