Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40024767›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2025

Outcomes of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Management of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts.

I Wayan Sudarma, Putu Febry Krisna Pertiwi, Ketut Putu Yasa, I Komang Adhi Parama Harta

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Surgical Safety of Uniportal versus Multiportal VATS Segmentectomy during Institutional Adoption: Differential Impact by Lobar Location.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I Wayan SudarmaCardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-3138
Putu Febry Krisna PertiwiFaculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0370-9733
Ketut Putu YasaCardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-0073
I Komang Adhi Parama HartaCardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-3091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) has been increasingly adopted for lung cancer management. This study aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of UVATS versus multiportal VATS (MVATS).

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted on electronic databases. Perioperative outcomes evaluated were postoperative complications, conversion to open thoracotomy, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores on postoperative days 1 (POD1) and 3 (POD3). The oncological outcomes assessed were total lymph nodes retrieved. Individual patient time-to-event data were estimated from published Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsThe analysis demonstrated that UVATS was associated with significantly lower postoperative complications (relative risk [RR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-0.91; p = 0.002), lower VAS scores on POD1(MD: -0.44; 95% CI: -0.70, -0.17; p = 0.001) and POD3 (MD: 0.76; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.36; p <0.001) compared to MVATS. Although UVATS had a lower conversion rate, this difference was not statistically significant (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.33-1.18; p = 0.15). MVATS retrieved a higher number of lymph nodes, but this difference was also not statistically significant (MD: 0.6; 95% CI: -1.39, 0.12, p = 0.1). The overall survival probability at 96 months was slightly higher in the MVATS group (82.49%) compared to the UVATS group (75.89%), with a p-value of 0.5. Disease-free survival was comparable between the groups (75.43% UVATS and 74.74% MVATS, p = 0.59).

conclusionUVATS demonstrated favorable perioperative outcomes and comparable oncological efficacy to MVATS in the management of lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAgedFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomelung neoplasmsurvival analysisthoracic surgeryvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40024767
PMCPMC11885935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.