ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH2025
Prognostic predictors of newly diagnosed Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-THP-COP regimen.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic value of models such as the international prognostic index (IPI) in patients with malignant lymphomas treated with a combination of rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone is well established. However, whether these prognostic models apply to patients treated with a combination of tetrahydropyranyl adriamycin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-THP-COP) is unclear. This retrospective analysis included 101 patients with Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R-THP-COP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), complete response rate (CRR), and effectiveness of risk prediction in the IPI, revised international prognostic index (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI groups. OS and PFS at 5 years were 67% and 58.9%. CRR was 63.5%. The IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI predicted the outcomes of patients treated with R-THP-COP. According to the NCCN-IPI, OS and PFS could distinguish four risk groups. In conclusion, the NCCN-IPI is the most effective prognostic tool for identifying patients with poor prognosis, even those treated with R-THP-COP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.