ReviewInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Differences in Lung Cancer-related Clinical Practice and Basic Research Background between Japan and China: A Narrative Review.
Review in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With its increasing incidence, lung cancer has become one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, posing a great threat to the health and lives of patients. Due to varying economic and cultural backgrounds, there are significant differences in clinical treatment practices and related basic research on lung cancer between Japan and China. These differences are mainly reflected in many aspects, such as cancer prevention, cancer treatment, provision of medical insurance, patient compliance, medical education system, and sources of research funding. By understanding these differences, Japan and China can learn from each other, make progress together, and strengthen further exchanges and cooperation, which will help improve the long-term efficacy of lung cancer treatment and improve patients' clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.