Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40023780›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025

National consensus statement on opioid agonist treatment in custodial settings.

Jocelyn Chan, Jon Cook, Michael Curtis, Adrian J Dunlop, Ele Morrison, Suzanne Nielsen, Rebecca J Winter, Thileepan Naren

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jocelyn ChanBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-8536-2048
Jon CookWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Michael CurtisBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-0867
Adrian J DunlopHunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-5966
Ele MorrisonAustralian Injecting and Illicit Drug Users League, Sydney, NSW.
Suzanne NielsenMonash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-1055
Rebecca J WinterBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-2067-4278
Thileepan NarenWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioid use and dependence are prevalent among incarcerated people, contributing to elevated rates of overdose and other harms in this population. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) has been shown to be an effective intervention to mitigate these risks. However, challenges to health care implementation in the custodial sector result in suboptimal and variable access to OAT in prisons nationally. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: Among a national multidisciplinary expert panel, we conducted a modified Delphi study that yielded 19 recommendations to government, relevant health authorities and custodial health services. These recommendations cover five core domains: induction or continuation of OAT, OAT options and administration, transition of care to the community, special populations, and organisational support. Key recommendations include prompt recognition and treatment of opioid withdrawal, active linkage to community-based OAT providers upon release, and ensuring appropriate organisational support through local protocols, adequate funding, and monitoring of key program indicators. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS STATEMENT: This consensus statement addresses a significant gap in national policy on OAT in Australian prisons. The recommendations, finalised in July 2024, set forth best practice standards grounded in evidence and expert consensus. We expect that implementing these recommendations will enhance the quality, consistency and continuity of OAT both within prison and upon release. Optimising OAT provision is crucial for improving health outcomes and addressing the risk of overdose, which is the leading cause of death among people released from prison.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrisonersPrisonsAustraliaDelphi TechniqueDrug OverdoseHumansAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneOpioid‐related disordersPrison

Identifiers

PMID40023780
PMCPMC11910952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.