ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2025
Digital Marketing Claims and Their Association With the Perceptions of Parents of Children Under 2 Years Old of Commercial Milk Formulas in Mexico.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analysed digital marketing claims for commercial milk formula (CMF) and their association with parents' perceptions of the health and nutrition benefits of this industrialised product. The study sample consisted of 1074 parents ≥ 18 years old with internet access, with children < 2 years old, living in Mexico, who responded to an online survey between December 2020 and January 2021. The most frequent health-related, nutrition, technical, and emotional claims on websites and social media of major CMF brands, online pharmacies, and supermarkets were identified and linked to parents' potential exposure. The degree of favourable perception of CMF was estimated using a Likert scale and categorised as high versus low. Adjusted logistic regressions were used to assess the association between potential exposure to CMF claims and the parents' perceptions of these products. Parents who were potentially exposed to the following CMF claims on digital media: 'No sugar added' (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.14-2.0), 'Prevents diseases' (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.04-1.88), and 'Information related to COVID-19' (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.57-2.74) were more likely to have a positive perception of CMF compared to those not exposed to these claims. In conclusion, parents' potential exposure to health-related and nutrition claims from leading CMF brands on websites and social media in Mexico was associated with a favourable perception of these products. The results support the World Health Assembly resolutions not to allow nutrition and health claims for CMFs, as they can be used to promote these products as equivalent or superior to breastfeeding. Action is needed to ensure that prohibition of CMF claims applies to digital media, as recommended by recent global guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.