ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
Reproductive Health Counseling and Outcomes Among Women With Congenital Heart Defects: Results From the Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and Well-Being, 2016-2019.
Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Its Predictors, Including Subjective Transition Readiness to Adulthood.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Self-Care Behaviors and Its Associated Factors in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines recommend tailored reproductive health counseling for women with congenital heart defects (CHDs) beginning in adolescence, yet provider adherence to recommendations remains understudied, particularly outside specialized cardiac care settings. STUDY
designWe conducted a cross-sectional cohort study among women aged 19 to 38 with CHDs, identified from active population-based birth defects registries in three states. Participants completed surveys from 2016 to 2019, including questions about contraception, pregnancy counseling, concerns, and experiences. Multivariable Poisson regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and health characteristics, assessed associations between CHD severity, counseling, and reproductive health outcomes.
resultsOf 765 women, those with severe CHDs, compared with non-severe, were more likely to report receiving clinician counseling about safe contraceptive methods (44.0% and 13.7%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [2.2, 4.0]), pregnancy, (63.3% and 16.5%; aPR = 3.6; 95% CI [2.7, 4.6]), and pregnancy avoidance (32.0% and 6.4%; aPR = 4.3; 95% CI [2.9, 6.6]); be concerned about ability to have children (40.9% and 31.2%; aPR = 1.4; 95% CI [1.1, 1.8]), and delay/avoid pregnancy (26.6% and 10.7%; aPR = 2.2; 95% CI [1.5, 3.2]). No disparity was found in ever being pregnant (30.0% vs. 37.2%; aPR = 1.0; 95% CI [0.7, 1.2]). One-third of the respondents with any CHD reported concerns about their ability to have children (33.6%).
conclusionWe found that only a minority of women with CHDs reported receiving counseling on safe contraception and pregnancy, and about a third reported concerns about their ability to have children. These findings highlight a gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, underscoring the need for improved reproductive health discussions for women with CHDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.