ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics2025
Emerging 3D printing technologies for solid oral dosage forms: Processes, materials and analytical tools for real-time assessment.
Review in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Applied to Formulation Design, Process Optimization, and Quality Control in 3D Printed Drug Products: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Quality by Design and Process Analytical Technology for On-Demand Drug Manufacturing Through 3D Printing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- From Digital Design to Dosage Performance: Material-Process-Geometry Interactions in 3D-Printed Oral Tablets.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- A process-driven approach for manufacturing personalized intravaginal rings using droplet deposition modeling.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Isoniazid Chewable Gels for On-Demand Latent Tuberculosis Treatment in Children.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology with the potential to increase manufacturing flexibility and enable personalized drug delivery. 3D printing may form tablets using digitally controlled layer-by-layer material deposition, permitting the tailoring of solid oral dosage geometry and facile modifications of drug release profiles without requiring extensive alterations to the pharmaceutical formulation and process. The challenge to assure the quality of drugs still lies in monitoring and controlling critical steps in the 3D printing process. Optimizing an 3D printing process requires a comprehensive understanding of the critical process parameters, material attributes and their impact on the performance of 3D-printed tablets. This review focuses on recent advances in 3D printing technologies for solid oral dosage forms, emphasizing critical process parameters and material attributes that may be considered for optimizing printing processes and enhancing the quality of printed tablets. Additionally, this review explores real-time analytical tools and the crucial considerations for ensuring the performance of building materials, printing processes, and manufactured solid drug products. This review contributes to the ongoing discourse on harnessing the potential of 3D printing in the pharmaceutical field while emphasizing the imperative need for quality assurance throughout additive manufacturing processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.