Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022702›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

Quality of Life and Factors Associated with Quality of Life among Patients with Lung Cancer in Northeastern Thailand.

Somkiattiyos Woradet, Bhunyabhadh Chaimay, Nuntiput Putthanachote, Pongdech Sarakarn, Jutalux Kaewmafai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pre-treatment quality of life and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Somkiattiyos WoradetFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Thaksin University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5758-4081
Bhunyabhadh ChaimayFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Thaksin University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-6905
Nuntiput PutthanachoteCancer Research Office, Roi Et Hospital, Roi Et Province, Thailand.
Pongdech SarakarnASEAN Cancer Epidemiology and Preventive Research Group (ACEP), Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0549-9993
Jutalux KaewmafaiDepartment of Nursing, Roi Et Hospital, Roi Et Province, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, severely affecting patients' quality of life (QoL). Understanding the factors associated with QoL in these patients is crucial for improving treatment and care. This study aimed to assess QoL among lung cancer patients and identify the factors influencing it.

methodsThis cross-sectional analytic study included 130 patients diagnosed with lung cancer at a tertiary facility in Northeastern Thailand. QoL was evaluated using the FACT-L interview, covering subscales such as physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as a lung cancer subscale, and the FACT-L Trial Outcome Index (TOI) and FACT-G. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression were used for data analysis.

resultsThe majority of subjects had low overall QoL (52.31%; Mean ± SD: 45.24 ± 11.33), low FACT-L TOI (83.08%; 21.05 ± 9.21), and low FACT-G (57.69%; 35.72 ± 8.70). Subscale analysis revealed low levels of physical well-being (85.38%; 6.56 ± 3.54), emotional well-being (85.38%; 6.15 ± 3.67), and functional well-being (96.15%; 4.97 ± 3.82). However, about half of the subjects reported moderate social/family well-being (50.77%; 18.04 ± 4.17) and lung cancer subscale scores (56.15%; 9.51 ± 4.31). Multivariate analysis identified factors significantly associated with higher QoL, including age (AOR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10), absence of comorbidities (AOR = 3.95, 95% CI: 1.60-9.74), and absence of lymph node invasion (AOR = 4.42, 95% CI: 1.26-15.56). Conversely, sleep problems (AOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.81), local metastasis (AOR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.72), and undergoing radiotherapy (AOR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.98) were associated with lower QoL.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that lung cancer patients with sleep problems, local metastasis, or undergoing radiotherapy should receive intensive palliative care to improve their QoL during the end of life stage.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandFACT-LLung cancerNortheastern ThailandQuality of LifeSubscale of quality of life

Identifiers

PMID40022702
PMCPMC12118042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.