ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
A Community-based Assessment of Exposure to Tobacco Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship (TAPS) among Adults Residing in an Urbanized Village in Delhi, India.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship (TAPS) is known to significantly reduce tobacco consumption and has been incorporated into the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control since 2003. Though Indian legislation also comprehensively bans TAPS, existing literature indicates poor and non-uniform implementation across the country. This study aims to assess the exposure to TAPS among adults residing in an urbanised village in South Delhi.
methodsIt was a community-based cross-sectional house-to-house survey conducted in Aliganj, Delhi, between Apr 21 and Jun 21. 490 residents aged ≥ 15 years were included in the study. The interview was conducted using the Global Adult Tobacco Survey questionnaire. Data was analyzed using SPSS 21. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the channels of communication where exposure to messaging encouraged thoughts of quitting.
resultsOut of 490 study participants, 93(18.9%) were exposed to TAPS for smoked tobacco products, 88(17.9%) for smokeless tobacco products, and 74(15.1%) for both smoked and smokeless tobacco on various platforms. Exposure to TAPS for smokeless tobacco was more likely at stores where the products are sold (aOR = 2.19;95% C.I.-1.19-3.98), on television (aOR = 4.12;95% C.I.-1.49-11.39), billboards (aOR = 3.48;95% C.I.-1.18-10.29), and posters (aOR = 3.04;95% C.I.-1.22-7.60). Among smokers, 77.1%, and smokeless tobacco users, 75.4% had to quit thoughts triggered by packet warnings. Education and employment were found to be significantly associated.
conclusionAlmost one-fifth of the participants were exposed to TAPS through various channels. Our findings indicate that implementing the TAPS ban remains partial in our study area, especially regarding smokeless tobacco products, compared to state and national level estimates. Focusing on mass media anti-tobacco campaigns for both smoked and smokeless products, through television, newspapers, and magazines, in addition to comprehensive TAPS ban enforcement, can contribute effectively to reducing tobacco consumption in our study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.