ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Incidence of Malignancy in Appendicectomy Specimens.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the incidence of malignancy as well as neoplasia in the appendicectomy specimens routinely sent for histopathology.
methodsWe conducted this retrospective cohort study of 947 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis with subsequent appendectomy in the period between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 (5 years) at Ibra hospital, North Sharqiya, Sultanate of Oman. We analyzed the clinical data of the cohort including demographic information, diagnosis, pre-operative imaging, histological diagnosis and incidence of malignancy in appendicectomy specimens.
resultsThe median age of patients was 36.4 years (range 13-80 years). The male-to-female ratio in the appendicectomy cohort was 1.03:1. Post-operative histology revealed out of 947 cases just 8(0.8%) cases were diagnosed as cancer. Acute appendicitis 851(89.9%) and negative appendicectomy 88(9.3%).
conclusionThe incidental identification of appendiceal cancers in the resected specimens after acute appendicitis is not uncommon. It is recommended to consider such diagnosis when dealing with acute appendicitis in older patients with longer symptom history and in the presence of peri-appendiceal mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.