Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022616›Full record

ArticleTrauma, violence & abuse2025

Strengths for Helping Professionals Exposed to Secondary Trauma: A Scoping Review.

Kate Whittenbury, Shelby L Clark, Matthew Brooks, Tessa Murphy, Martin J Turner, Hannah Fawcett

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trauma, Mental Health Workforce Shortages, and Health Equity: A Crisis in Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate WhittenburyManchester Metropolitan University, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1234-0742
Shelby L ClarkUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Matthew BrooksManchester Metropolitan University, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5469-7769
Tessa MurphyManchester Metropolitan University, UK.
Martin J TurnerManchester Metropolitan University, UK.
Hannah FawcettManchester Metropolitan University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helping professionals working with people who have experienced trauma are at risk of developing psychological distress. To date, most studies exploring psychological distress among helping professionals have focused on risk factors associated with the development of adverse reactions to secondary trauma, and few have identified strengths or protective factors, which may buffer and/or alleviate distress. Therefore, this scoping review uses the Resilience Portfolio Model (Grych et al., 2015) to synthesize literature on individual and environmental strengths, which may mitigate adverse reactions to secondary trauma in helping professionals. Utilizing the CINAHL, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE databases, 43 articles published between 1990 and May 2023 from over 20 countries were identified. The findings suggest that professionals draw upon a portfolio of meaning-making, regulatory, interpersonal, and ecological strengths to increase their protective resources. Most studies identified were quantitative, and usually explored organizational factors, such as supervision. Further empirical investigations could help identify individual strengths that could be targeted within interventions to protect professionals against the impact of secondary traumatic stress. Additionally, more research is needed to investigate the interconnectedness of individual, organizational, and systemic factors that buffer helping professionals from the deleterious effects of trauma work.

Indexed as

Compassion FatigueHealth PersonnelResilience, PsychologicalHumanshelping professionalsprotective factorsresiliencesecondary traumasecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID40022616
PMCPMC11872055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.