ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Reconciling the Discrepancy in Projected Global Dryland Expansion in a Warming World.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CONature communications · 2026Article
- Aridity and drought: distinct concepts often conflated in ecological research.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Herbaceous plant communities respond more to seasonal precipitation than cumulative drought in the hot deserts of the United States.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- Latitudinal divergence in runoff responses to global forestation due to forest-atmosphere feedbacks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Development of daily downscaled, bias-corrected CMIP6 climate datasets for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in South Asia.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A comprehensive crop suitability assessment under modern irrigation system in arid croplands.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continental drying and associated dryland expansion would accelerate environmental degradation and desertification. However, the rate of continental drying commonly assessed with an aridity index is inconsistent with observations and projections of widespread greening and increased global runoff. This raises questions about the accuracy of assessment methods and projections of continental drying and dryland dynamics in a warming world. Here we show that the continental drying trend has been exaggerated because the potential evapotranspiration (PET) and its rate of increase over time are grossly overestimated with the widely used Penman equations. Using an energy-based PET estimator, we bias correct the aridity index and find considerably weaker and less extensive continental drying (47% of the global land area) than the 61%-65% based on Penman equations. Dryland expansion is projected to occur over only 2.1% of global land area in a high-emission scenario in the 21st century. Moreover, the corrected aridity index and ecohydrological and hydroclimate projections all show no change in significance consistently in the extent of global drylands based on 32 climate models. These findings resolve the ongoing debate about global dryland expansion and have far-reaching implications for understanding long-term changes in the climate system and their impacts on terrestrial ecohydrological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.