Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022576›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Dynamic Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA to Predict the Risk of Non In Situ Recurrence of Postoperative Glioma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Guangzhong Guo, Ziyue Zhang, Jiubing Zhang, Dayang Wang, Sensen Xu, Shuang Wu, Kaiyuan Deng, Yage Bu, Zhiyuan Sheng, Jinliang Yu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Guangzhong GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2340-5393
Ziyue ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jiubing ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2549-4068
Dayang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Sensen XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4290-9514
Shuang WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-6902
Kaiyuan DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yage BuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhiyuan ShengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jinliang YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-659X
Yushuai GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhaoyue YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ruijiao ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Meiyun WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Tianxiao LiHenan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention Innovation, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xingyao BuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juha International Center for Neurosurgery, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-9742

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province 232300421171the Research Foundation of the Health Commission of Henan Province SBGJ202302007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioma recurrence can be divided into in situ recurrence and non-in situ recurrence, and the mutation evolution of gliomas with different recurrence patterns is still unknown. We used sequential sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to compare the somatic mutation profile and clonal evolution of gliomas with different recurrence patterns. To investigate the value of ctDNA in predicting early postoperative tumor recurrence and guiding prognosis stratification in patients with glioma.

methodsWe prospectively recruited 92 patients with near-total resection of gliomas from our center. Two hundred and thirty-four postoperative tissue and Tumor In Situ Fluid (TISF) samples from 69 eligible patients were included in ctDNA analysis.

resultsAmong the 69 patients, 37 glioblastoma (GBM) patients experienced recurrence, and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was not significantly different between the situ recurrence group and the non-in situ recurrence group (8.6 vs. 6.1 months). The ctDNA of recurrent tissue and TISF were significantly consistent. Before and after initial treatment, TISF-ctDNA mutant allele fraction (MAF), subclonal mutation, and alterations in related pathways (lysine degradation and PI3K pathway) were negatively correlated with treatment response and PFS. Among recurrent GBM patients, EGFR mutations were the most common. Mutations related to the RTK-RAS pathway (NF1) were most common in patients with situ recurrent GBM, while mutations in the MUC family and TP53 pathway (MUC16, CHEK2) were prevalent and continuously increased in patients with non-in situ recurrent GBM.

conclusionsIn glioma patients undergoing primary surgery, dynamic monitoring of ctDNA and genotyping can be used for early risk stratification, efficacy monitoring, and early recurrence detection, and provide a basis for clinical research to evaluate early therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAGliomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAbiomarkercirculating tumor DNAclonal evolutiongliomarisk stratificationtumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID40022576
PMCPMC11871513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.