ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2025
Prevalence of Constitutional Pathogenic Variant in a Cohort of 348 Patients With Multiple Primary Cancer Addressed in Oncogenetic Consultation.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple primary malignancies (MPMs) refer to two or more primary malignant tumors in the same patient. MPMs are frequent: 18.4% of incident cancers represent a second or a higher primary cancer. In order to assess the value of genetic testing for patients with multiple cancers, studies are needed to accurately determine the prevalence of pathogenic variants for these patients.
methodsAll families were seen in our oncogenetics consultation from 2010 to 2022. We compared clinical features and detection rates of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in a panel of up to 47 cancer predisposition genes in patients with ≥ 2 primary cancers (n = 348) versus a single primary cancer (n = 1422).
resultsA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was diagnosed in 27.3% of patients with 348 index patients with MPM, concerning 21 genes: BRCA1 (n = 27), BRCA2 (n = 19), MSH2 (n = 9), ATM (n = 8), MLH1 (n = 5), MSH6 (n = 6), TP53 (n = 4), CHEK2 (n = 4), PALB2 (n = 3), APC (n = 2), MEN1 (n = 1), RAD51C (n = 1), NBN (n = 1), EPCAM (n = 1), PMS2 (n = 1), RB1 (n = 1), PTEN (n = 1), CYLD1 (n = 1), NF1 (n = 1), RAD51D (n = 1), and CDKN2A (n = 1). MPM index cases were more likely to carry a deleterious mutation than cases with a single cancer (27.3% vs. 11.39%, p < 0.001). Pathogenic variants were found more frequently in patients with a suggestive family history (34.2% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.05), with a younger age of cancer diagnosis related to the suspected syndrome (32.7% vs. 22%, p = 0.049). For the 208 index patients with ≥ 2 cancers pertaining to the same predisposition syndrome (HBOC, HNPCC…), the detection rate increased significantly to 36% (vs. 14.3% for MPM patients with unrelated cancers (n = 140), p < 0.001). Conversely, the detection rate for patients with unrelated cancers was not statistically different from the single-cancer population (14.3%-11.39%, p = 0.318).
conclusionPatients referred for oncogenetic testing with MPM are more likely to carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes than patients with a single primary cancer (p < 0.05), especially if the cancers are related to the same predisposition syndrome. If the cancers are unrelated, no statistical difference in comparison to the single-cancer population was observed. For these latter patients, we recommend using the specific criteria of each tumor to propose appropriate genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.