Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022545›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2025

Prevalence of Constitutional Pathogenic Variant in a Cohort of 348 Patients With Multiple Primary Cancer Addressed in Oncogenetic Consultation.

Mathis Lepage, Nancy Uhrhammer, Ioana Molnar, Maud Privat, Flora Ponelle-Chachuat, Mathilde Gay-Bellile, Yannick Bidet, Mathias Cavaillé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mathis LepageDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0315-3938
Nancy UhrhammerDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ioana MolnarDivision de Recherche Clinique, Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation, Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Maud PrivatDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9373-3902
Flora Ponelle-ChachuatDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Mathilde Gay-BellileDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yannick BidetDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Mathias CavailléDépartement d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultiple primary malignancies (MPMs) refer to two or more primary malignant tumors in the same patient. MPMs are frequent: 18.4% of incident cancers represent a second or a higher primary cancer. In order to assess the value of genetic testing for patients with multiple cancers, studies are needed to accurately determine the prevalence of pathogenic variants for these patients.

methodsAll families were seen in our oncogenetics consultation from 2010 to 2022. We compared clinical features and detection rates of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in a panel of up to 47 cancer predisposition genes in patients with ≥ 2 primary cancers (n = 348) versus a single primary cancer (n = 1422).

resultsA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was diagnosed in 27.3% of patients with 348 index patients with MPM, concerning 21 genes: BRCA1 (n = 27), BRCA2 (n = 19), MSH2 (n = 9), ATM (n = 8), MLH1 (n = 5), MSH6 (n = 6), TP53 (n = 4), CHEK2 (n = 4), PALB2 (n = 3), APC (n = 2), MEN1 (n = 1), RAD51C (n = 1), NBN (n = 1), EPCAM (n = 1), PMS2 (n = 1), RB1 (n = 1), PTEN (n = 1), CYLD1 (n = 1), NF1 (n = 1), RAD51D (n = 1), and CDKN2A (n = 1). MPM index cases were more likely to carry a deleterious mutation than cases with a single cancer (27.3% vs. 11.39%, p < 0.001). Pathogenic variants were found more frequently in patients with a suggestive family history (34.2% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.05), with a younger age of cancer diagnosis related to the suspected syndrome (32.7% vs. 22%, p = 0.049). For the 208 index patients with ≥ 2 cancers pertaining to the same predisposition syndrome (HBOC, HNPCC…), the detection rate increased significantly to 36% (vs. 14.3% for MPM patients with unrelated cancers (n = 140), p < 0.001). Conversely, the detection rate for patients with unrelated cancers was not statistically different from the single-cancer population (14.3%-11.39%, p = 0.318).

conclusionPatients referred for oncogenetic testing with MPM are more likely to carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes than patients with a single primary cancer (p < 0.05), especially if the cancers are related to the same predisposition syndrome. If the cancers are unrelated, no statistical difference in comparison to the single-cancer population was observed. For these latter patients, we recommend using the specific criteria of each tumor to propose appropriate genetic testing.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Multiple PrimaryAdultAgedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrevalencegenetic testinggermlinemultiple primary cancer

Identifiers

PMID40022545
PMCPMC11871423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.