Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022456›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Consumer Experience of an Australian Multidisciplinary Long COVID Clinic That Incorporates Personalised Exercise Prescription: A Qualitative Analysis.

Tanya Buettikofer, Allison Maher, Veronica Rainbird, Michelle Bennett, Nicole Freene, Imogen Mitchell, Hsin-Chia Carol Huang, Philip Gaughwin, Mary Johnson, Jenny Paratz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient and Professional Perspectives on Long COVID: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tanya BuettikoferCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-9937
Allison MaherCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Veronica RainbirdFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Michelle BennettCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Nicole FreeneFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Imogen MitchellCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Hsin-Chia Carol HuangCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Philip GaughwinCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Mary JohnsonCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Jenny ParatzThe Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Bernie BissettCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

This study was supported by Canberra Hospital Private Practice Fund and Exercise and Sports Science Australia.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia, Long COVID is prevalent in 5%-10% of COVID-19 cases. Few multidisciplinary services exist to support recovery from Long COVID.

objectiveTo understand the consumer experience and acceptability of a novel Australian Long COVID Recovery Clinic, which incorporates personalised exercise prescription including respiratory and peripheral strengthening and carefully monitored cardiovascular training.

designQualitative study; semi-structured interviews conducted by a researcher external to the clinic delivery. SETTING,

participantsA convenience sample of participants who have completed the Long COVID Recovery Clinic.

main outcome measuresMajor themes were identified by inductive thematic analysis.

resultsFifteen participants were interviewed. 14/15 (93%) participants described the clinic model as acceptable or highly acceptable. Five core themes were identified, including (1) encouraging staff and light-filled facilities support recovery; (2) supervised exercise and pacing improve confidence with exercise; (3) peer support and group therapy augments recovery; (4) other services augment Long COVID recovery, and (5) importance of GP involvement in connection with clinic participation. Suggestions for improvement included extending the duration of the clinic programme beyond 2 months, reducing wait times by increasing staffing levels and adjusting the clinic schedule to broaden access options.

conclusionsThe majority of participants found that the Long COVID Recovery Clinic, which incorporates both supervised exercise and pacing, is acceptable and would recommend it to others. From the consumer perspective, the Long COVID Recovery Clinic aids recovery alongside GP management through a combination of peer support and an individually tailored programme. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A consumer was a highly valued member of our research team. She has been involved in study design, analysis, and interpretation. She has also been involved in editing the manuscript and provided advice to ensure the language used in the manuscript is sensitive to a consumer audience. As our consumer meets the authorship guidelines, we have included her as an author in this manuscript. We also intend to include our consumers in the dissemination of these results when published (e.g., social media).

trial registrationThe study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12622000719730.

Indexed as

COVID-19Exercise TherapyAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2consumer experienceexerciseLong COVIDmultidisciplinaryrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40022456
PMCPMC11871118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.