ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Automatic gait EVENT detection in older adults during perturbed walking.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Model Artificial Intelligence Framework Integrating AI-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Dynamic Gait Prediction and Health-Status Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Temporal Gait Analysis Using a Smartphone IMU in Older Adults with and Without Non-Specific Low Back Pain.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development, Reliability, and Validity Assessment of a Portable 3D Camera-Based System for Quantifying Postural Sway and Balance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of AI-based markerless gait event detection during perturbed walking using smartphone videos from two camera perspectives.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Accuracy and Inter-Subject Variability of Gait Event Detection Methods Based on Optical and Inertial Motion Capture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging assistive technology for visually impaired people through optimal deep transfer learning based object detection model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of gait events in older adults, particularly during perturbed walking, is essential for evaluating balance control and fall risk. Traditional force plate-based methods often face limitations in perturbed walking scenarios due to the difficulty in landing cleanly on the force plates. Subsequently, previous studies have not addressed gait event automatic detection methods for perturbed walking. This study introduces an automated gait event detection method using a bidirectional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) model, leveraging ground reaction force, joint angles, and marker data, for both regular and perturbed walking scenarios from 307 healthy older adults. Our marker-based model achieved over 97% accuracy with a mean error of less than 14 ms in detecting touchdown (TD) and liftoff (LO) events for both walking scenarios. The results highlight the efficacy of kinematic approaches, demonstrating their potential in gait event detection for clinical settings. When integrated with wearable sensors or computer vision techniques, these methods enable real-time, precise monitoring of gait patterns, which is helpful for applying personalized programs for fall prevention. This work takes a significant step forward in automated gait analysis for perturbed walking, offering a reliable method for evaluating gait patterns, balance control, and fall risk in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.