Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022106›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025

Cumulative risk assessment methodology applied to non-dietary exposures: developmental alterations in professional agricultural settings.

Luca Tosti, Martina Marazzini, Mohammed Kanadil, Francesca Metruccio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca TostiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7656-3681
Martina MarazziniDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5674-8659
Mohammed KanadilDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7546-0398
Francesca MetruccioInternational Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy. metruccio.francesca@asst-fbf-sacco.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8330-6352

Funding

European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) 101057014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety assessment of combined exposure to xenobiotics has been an emerging topic for several years. Methodologies and approaches for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) are being developed primarily for the dietary risk assessment of pesticides, thus focusing only on consumer exposure. However, as highlighted in recent years, non-dietary exposures, such as those encountered by professionals in agricultural settings, may pose a significant risk due to their higher levels compared to dietary exposure. Despite this, existing methodologies for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) have not adequately addressed this critical aspect. In the EU, even if several legislations highlight the need to address the non-dietary CRA, no legal requirements are in place yet, therefore, there are no harmonized methodologies and approaches currently available. In a first step to fill this gap, this study is aimed at exploring CRA methodology applied to non-dietary exposure to pesticide in agricultural settings, specifically targeting operators, re-entry workers, and bystanders. The primary objective of the study was to verify the feasibility of an electronic register of plant protection treatments as data source for identifying and characterizing in field mixtures and consequently estimating cumulative non-dietary systemic exposure in real life. The relevant active substances selected for this investigation were those listed in foetal craniofacial alterations cumulative assessment groups (CAGs), established by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for dietary CRA. Exposures to pesticides were estimated using European Union agreed mathematical models. The preliminary findings of this investigation effectively revealed the value of the register of treatments in assessing real-life plant protection products (PPP) usage in professional agricultural settings. In conclusion, the study provides encouraging insights into using the pesticide dietary CRA approach for non-dietary risk assessment in agricultural settings, underlining the necessity for further research and investigation of its feasibility for the evaluation of other acute effects but also for long-term effects related CAGs.

Indexed as

Cumulative risk assessmentMixturesNon-dietary exposureOccupationalPesticides

Identifiers

PMID40022106
PMCPMC11869452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.