ArticleBMC public health2025
Exploring different modelling approaches to forecast the community acute respiratory infections burden in children: an Italian epidemiological time series study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-school wheeze treatment patterns in the primary care setting in Italy.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Zoonotic diseases in China: epidemiological trends, incidence forecasting, and comparative analysis between real-world surveillance data and Global Burden of Disease 2021 estimates.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory infections (ARIs) in young children pose a significant global health challenge, leading to high rates of illness and death. They are estimated to be the fourth leading cause of mortality worldwide, particularly impacting children under five. This study aimed to identify the most effective time series model(s) for forecasting the epidemiological season burden of ARIs for the current 2023/2024 period in Italy.
methodsData on the burden of ARIs' in children aged 0-14 years were retrieved from Pedianet, an Italian paediatric primary care database which includes over 200 family paediatricians. We analysed monthly incidence rates of ARIs from September 2010 to September 2023, following the typical seasonal pattern of these infections. Several forecasting models were compared to predict the future burden of ARI: Error, Trend, Seasonality (ETS); Seasonal Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA); Unobserved Component Model (UCM); and Trigonometric, Box Cox, ARMA errors, Trend, Seasonal (TBATS). We evaluated each model's accuracy by examining the residuals and the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The period between March 2020 and February 2022 was forecasted to represent the normal trend without COVID-19. Model parameters were estimated using the in-sample and out-of-sample approach.
resultsThe analysis included data from over 1.4 million cases of ARIs retrieved in children aged 0-14 years. The ETS model was implemented to predict the pandemic period. Overall, our findings suggest that exponential smoothing models as ETS (MAPE = 6.85) and TBATS (MAPE = 6.87) were most effective in predicting future trends in monthly ARIs' burden compared to other methods (i.e., UCM MAPE = 11.08, and SARIMA MAPE = 25.33).
conclusionsThese findings suggest that exponential smoothing models are preferable for forecasting pediatric ARIs' burden trends in Italy. However, epidemiological data from the ongoing season are crucial for understanding whether residual pandemic effects continue affecting respiratory infection patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.