Observational studyBMC women's health2025
The present adenomyosis treatment status in Luzhou, China: a small scope observational cross-sectional survey.
Observational study in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the current treatment status and management deficiencies of adenomyosis in Luzhou, China. MATERIALS AND
methodsA small-scale observational cross-sectional study of patients whose imaging suggests adenomyosis from July 2018 to February 2022 at a teaching hospital in Luzhou, China. All participants (1542 patients) completed a questionnaire of 14 items, including basic information, symptoms, treatment options, outcomes, and costs. The patients' treatment options and the hysterectomy rate were evaluated.
resultsThe treatment options of hormone agents included combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs), gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and dienogest for 2.07, 46.04, 63.49, and 4.67% of patients, respectively. The treatment options under uterus-sparing surgery included adenomyectomy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, presenting in 3.76 and 33.27% of patients, respectively. Finally, 458 (29.70%) patients chose a hysterectomy. The hysterectomy rate between the hormone and uterus-sparing surgery sequential hormone groups (surgery group) was not significantly different (14.8 vs. 12.7%, χ2 = 0.344, P > 0.05). However, for the focal type and patients with > 24 months delayed treatment interval, the hysterectomy rate of the hormone group was significantly higher than that of the surgery group (8.5% vs. 1.3%, χ2 = 11.722, P < 0.01 and 26.7% vs. 18.5%, χ2 = 4.906, P < 0.05, respectively).
conclusionsThere were treatment delays and treatment selection bias in managing adenomyosis in Luzhou, China. Popular science education and early individualized hormone therapy are needed. Uterine-sparing surgery should be carefully selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.