ArticleBMC medicine2025
Non-invasive diagnosis of vulvar dysplasia using cervical methylation markers-a case control study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Performance of the ASCL1/ZNF582 Methylation Test for Detection of High-Grade Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Vulvar Cancer.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic screenings for vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesions (VSIL) are limited and without information on disease trends. A panel of six methylation markers (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, ZNF671; GynTect® assay) has shown promise in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Given the similarities between the carcinogenesis of cervix and vulva, this study aimed to investigate the suitability of these markers for diagnosing vulvar lesions.
methodsOne hundred twenty-one vulvar FFPE samples and 237 vulvar cell smears with different VSIL grades, HPV status, and with or without lichen sclerosus and planus were tested. Additionally, dysplasia-free vulvar cell smears from patients with cervical dysplasia were analyzed. The expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in the FFPE samples was measured.
resultsThe markers demonstrated high specificity in vulvar smears, with sole 5.45% of dysplasia-free smears testing positive. Yet, 75.00% of vulvar carcinoma smears appear positive in the methylation kit, similar to VHSIL (VIN III) smears with 77.78%. In FFPE samples, dysplasia-free samples from the tumor microenvironment of high-grade vulvar neoplasia showed 43.75% positivity. The positivity rates for VSIL and carcinoma samples were 76.92%, 64.71%, 64.71%, and 80.49%, respectively. DNMT3a expression was the highest in VLSIL (VIN I) samples, while DNMT1 was only expressed in VHSIL (VIN III) and carcinoma samples. Lichen sclerosis and planus showed a high false positive rate of 45.45% for dysplasia-free and 54.54% for smears with dVIN. Cervical HSIL was associated with a significantly higher number of positive results in the kit than in patients without cervical dysplasia.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that the methylation markers comprising GynTect® may be suitable for detecting vulvar neoplasia, as they exhibit high sensitivity. Nonetheless, adjustments are needed for comparable specificity. Lichen should be considered in result interpretation, and the kit should be used with caution for patients with lichen. Moreover, we observed methylation changes as an early event with the highest positivity of VLSIL. Surprisingly, changes in methylation pattern are not as local as presumed. Cervical SIL led to changed methylation in the vulva. Patients with positive kit results should be monitored regularly for all genital dysplasia. This sheds new light on the epigenetics in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.