Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40022013›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Effect of factors on the space between the posterior capsule and IOL.

Xiaohong Liu, Ning Cui, Chuyi Zhou, Jinyi Long, Ping Hu, Xue Wu, Yuhong Ye, Ling Xu, Zhengbing Zhou, Da Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaohong Liu *Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Ning Cui *Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Chuyi ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Jinyi LongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Ping HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xue WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Yuhong YeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Ling XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Zhengbing ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China. zhouzhengbing@yeah.net.
Da LongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China. 7250013210@shsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effect of factors on the space between the posterior capsule and IOL.

methodsA total of 126 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent AS-OCT examinations after surgery. The relationship between the posterior capsule-IOL (PC-IOL) adhesion range and various factors, including IOL type, follow-up period, axial length, and lens thickness, were analyzed.

resultsWhen the follow-up period was shorter than 1 week, the proportion of PC-IOL adhesion range greater than 1/2 in the ZA9003, softec, SN6ATX, and 525 groups was 66.7%, 78.9%, 25%, and 53.8%, respectively. When the follow-up period was longer than 1 month, these proportions increased to 75%, 100%, 40.8%, and 100%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the IOL types and follow-up period were statistically significant, while axial length and lens thickness were not statistically significant.

conclusionThe follow-up period and IOL types affect the space between the IOL and the posterior capsule, whereas axial length and lens thickness do not. Among the four IOL types studied, the softec IOL has the strongest adhesive power, while the SN6ATX IOL has the weakest.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationPosterior Capsule of the LensAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxial Length, EyeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceAS-OCTIOL typesPosterior capsule-IOL spacePosterior capsule opacification

Identifiers

PMID40022013
PMCPMC11869710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.