ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Effect of factors on the space between the posterior capsule and IOL.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effect of factors on the space between the posterior capsule and IOL.
methodsA total of 126 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent AS-OCT examinations after surgery. The relationship between the posterior capsule-IOL (PC-IOL) adhesion range and various factors, including IOL type, follow-up period, axial length, and lens thickness, were analyzed.
resultsWhen the follow-up period was shorter than 1 week, the proportion of PC-IOL adhesion range greater than 1/2 in the ZA9003, softec, SN6ATX, and 525 groups was 66.7%, 78.9%, 25%, and 53.8%, respectively. When the follow-up period was longer than 1 month, these proportions increased to 75%, 100%, 40.8%, and 100%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the IOL types and follow-up period were statistically significant, while axial length and lens thickness were not statistically significant.
conclusionThe follow-up period and IOL types affect the space between the IOL and the posterior capsule, whereas axial length and lens thickness do not. Among the four IOL types studied, the softec IOL has the strongest adhesive power, while the SN6ATX IOL has the weakest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.