ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Two virulent Vibrio campbellii phages with potential for phage therapy in aquaculture.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation and characterization of a novel Schitoviridae phage VipHU7 that infects Vibrio parahaemolyticus.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Prophage-Derived Molecules as Anti-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structural Receptors and Host Adaptations Affecting the Bacteriophage Targeting ofMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Characterization and genomic analysis of a novel Vibrio harveyi Vibrio phage LRZ.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Characterization of broad-host-range Salmonella phage GSP006 and its efficacy in controlling Salmonella Pullorum contamination in poultry feed and drinking water.BMC biotechnology · 2026Article
- Isolation and characterization of a broad-spectrumFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Isolation, Characterization, and Evaluation of a Lytic Jumbo Phage Z90 AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhanced control of pathogenicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Isolation, identification, and genomic analysis of bacteriophage GJKY-A for the prevention and treatment of citrus canker.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs aquaculture continues to expand globally, diseases caused by Vibrio species are becoming increasingly prevalent. Vibriosis encompasses a range of infections, which can lead to symptoms such as skin lesions, hemorrhaging, and high mortality rates in fish and shellfish, especially in high-density farming systems, resulting in significant economic losses. Simultaneously, the extensive use of antibiotics has fostered the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, exacerbated disease outbreaks, and complicated control measures. Phage therapy, which leverages bacteriophages as natural antibacterial agents, offers a promising eco-friendly alternative to the antibiotics used in aquaculture. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of two vibriophages for phage therapy in aquaculture.
resultsTwo virulent vibriophages, vB_VcaP_R24D and vB_VcaP_R25D, were isolated from aquaculture wastewater from seafood markets using Vibrio campbellii LMG 11216
conclusionsThese biological and genomic characteristics highlight the potential of vB_VcaP_R24D and vB_VcaP_R25D as effective biocontrol agents for mitigating vibriosis in aquaculture. Although this study demonstrates their narrow host range, the possibility of phage infection in other untested hosts cannot be entirely excluded. Furthermore, the findings offer valuable insights for future research on phage-host interactions and the development of phage cocktails to improve disease management in aquaculture systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.