ArticleBMC genomics2025
Genome-wide scan for selection signatures reveals novel insights into the adaptive capacity characteristics in three Chinese cattle breeds.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genetic Ancestry and Genome-Wide Association Study Combined with Functional Enrichment Analyses Reveal Candidate Genes for Body Conformation Traits in Hexi Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Comparative Genomics of European and Chinese Cattle Breeds Reveals Population Structure, Breeding History, and Adaptive Divergence.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Article
- Bovine Genome Database: new curated collection of selective sweeps in bovine populations across the world.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Selection signature analysis in chickens divergently selected for growth rate reveals novel candidate genes regulating fat deposition.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Whole-genome analysis reveals genetic diversity and selection pressure in Sichuan donkey.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Conservation of Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in China: Overview of the Status, Activities, Policies, and Challenges.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCattle have evolved genetic adaptations to a diverse range of agroecological zones, such as plateaus and arid zones. However, little is known about its genetic basis of adaptation to harsh environments within a short period of time after domestication. Here, we analyzed whole-genome sequence data from three indigenous cattle breeds (Anxi, Qaidam and Zhangmu) in northwest China and five worldwide cattle breeds (Angus, Holstein, Jersey, Gir and N'Dama) to explore their genetic composition and identify selective sweeps in the Chinese cattle breeds.
resultsAnalyses of phylogenetic and population structure revealed that three indigenous cattle breeds share genomic components from Bos taurus and Bos indicus. A novel set of candidate genes was identified through comparative genomic analyses of cattle from contrasting environments based on SNP and copy number variation (CNV) data. These candidate genes are potentially associated with adaptive phenotypes, including high-altitude adaptability (e.g., ANGPT1, PPARGC1A, RORA), cold climate adaptation (e.g., TSHR, PRKG, OXCT1), and dryland adaptation (e.g., PLEKHA7, NFATC1, PLCB1).
conclusionsThis study unravels the unique adaptive diversity of three Chinese indigenous cattle breeds, providing a valuable resource for future research on sustainable livestock breeding strategies to response to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.