ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
A discrete-time split-state framework for multi-state modeling with application to describing the course of heart disease.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating the effects of treatment regimes over the course of chronic disease: A multi-state causal framework with baseline confounding.Statistical methods in medical research · 2026Article
- Summary measures derived from a multi-state modeling framework to characterize the course of heart disease.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In chronic disease epidemiology, the investigation of disease etiology has largely focused on an endpoint, while the course of chronic disease is understudied, representing a knowledge gap. Multi-state models can be used to describe the course of chronic disease, such as Markov models which assume that the future state depends only on the present state, and semi-Markov models which allow transition rates to depend on the duration in the current state. However, these models are unsuitable for chronic diseases that are largely non-memoryless. We propose a Discrete-Time Split-State Framework that generates a process of substates by conditioning on past disease history and estimates discrete-time transition rates between substates as a function of duration in a (sub)state. Specifically, as the substates are created by conditioning on past history, they satisfy the Markov assumption, regardless of whether the original disease process is Markovian; and the transition rates are approximated by competing risks in a short time interval estimated from cause-specific Cox models. In the simulation study, we simulated a Markov process with an exponential distribution, a semi-Markov process with a Weibull distribution, and a non-Markov process with an exponential distribution. The coverage rate of transition rates estimated using our framework was 94% for the Markov process and 93% for the non-Markov process. However, the estimated transition rates were under coverage (72%) for the semi-Markov process, which is likely due to the approximation of transition rates in discrete time. In the application, we applied the framework to describe the course of heart disease in a large cohort study. In summary, the framework we proposed can be applied to both Markov and non-Markov processes and has potential to be applied to semi-Markov processes. For future research, as substates created using our framework track past disease history, the transition rates between substates have the potential to be used to derive summary estimates that characterize the disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.