ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Design and psychometric validation of a social capital questionnaire for adults with end-stage chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) can spill over into a patient's social life. Social capital (SC) is a determinant of health that can enhance patients' health through support and resources. However, no questionnaire is currently available to measure SC in ESKD patients. This study aimed to design and validate a questionnaire to measure SC in ESKD adults undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.
methodsA mixed methods approach was used to generate the questionnaire and determine its content validity with a panel of nine experts and content validity index, face validity through cognitive interviews with patients, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), criterion validity, reliability and the effect of known groups differences.
resultsContent validity was confirmed by an expert panel, achieving a content validity index value > 0.85 for all items. Face validity was achieved through cognitive interviews with 20 patients over 18 years of age in a terminal stage of CKD, ensuring that the target population understood the questions. An exploratory factor analysis used the sample of 610 patients and tested the structure of the seven dimensions of the structural domain (participation in organizations, links to institutions, social network sizes, collective activities, diversity, bridging, and bonding) and explained 95.7% of the total variance with a reliability of 0.89, and criterion validity > 0.32 (p < 0.05) for the correlations between the indices of each dimension and the domain index. The structure of the cognitive domain was tested for six dimensions (norms of reciprocity, social harmony, feeling of belonging, perceived fairness, social support, and social trust) with a total variance of 80.7%, reliability of 0.94 and criterion validity for correlations > 0.68 (p < 0.05). The confirmatory factor analysis with 352 patients proved the factorial structure adequate for both questionnaire domains and all dimensions, with CFI and TLI values > 0.9, an RMSEA ≤ 0.06, and SRMR ≤ 0.05.
conclusionsWe conclude that the questionnaire designed to measure social capital is valid and reliable for ESKD patients in Mexico.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.