ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Impact of simulated animated video education on patients' disease uncertainty, anxiety, and sleep quality in digestive endoscopy examination.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of short educational videos on learning and retention in undergraduate pharmacology education: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal endoscopy examinations were commonly associated with patient uncertainty, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. Simulated animated video education has emerged as a potential intervention to address these psychosocial aspects in the healthcare setting. This study explores the impact of simulated animated video education on patients' disease uncertainty, anxiety, and sleep quality in the context of digestive endoscopy examinations.
methodsA total 166 patients who underwent digestive endoscopy examinations were conducted and divided into the conventional education group (n = 77) and the simulated animated video education group (n = 89). Disease uncertainty was assessed using the Mishel's Uncertainty in Illness Scale (MUIS), anxiety was evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
resultsBoth conventional and simulated animated video education interventions led to a reduction in disease uncertainty, anxiety levels, and improvement in sleep quality post-education and at the one-month follow-up. However, the simulated animated video education group exhibited greater reductions in disease uncertainty (post-education: 86.69 ± 2.65 vs. 85.65 ± 3.46, P = 0.031; follow-up: 82.57 ± 4.57 vs. 81.21 ± 3.69, P = 0.038), anxiety (post-education: 19.88 ± 3.78 vs.18.75 ± 3.42, P = 0.046; follow-up: 18.59 ± 3.4 vs. 17.54 ± 3.25, P = 0.046), and improvement in sleep quality (post-education: 5.57 ± 1.25 vs. 5.15 ± 1.1, P = 0.023; follow-up: 5.22 ± 1.13 vs. 4.89 ± 0.86, P = 0.038) compared to the conventional education group.
conclusionThe study findings suggest that simulated animated video education was associated with reduced disease uncertainty, alleviated anxiety, and improved sleep quality among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.