ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between physical activity and cognitive function in a multi-ethnic Asian older adult population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical activity (PA) is regarded as a non-pharmacological preventive strategy against cognitive decline. This study aimed to examine the relationship between PA and cognitive function in cognitively normal older Malaysian adults from a multi-ethnic, urban-dwelling community. Participants completed a questionnaire with questions on demographic details, socioeconomic status, health conditions, and short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Bivariate analyses and hierarchical linear regression were conducted to examine the relationship between IPAQ and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Among the 382 participants (median age = 66 years), 51.6% were female. Median MoCA score was 24; and IPAQ levels were 28%, 39% and 33% 'Low', 'Moderate' and 'High' respectively. Bivariate analysis showed MoCA scores significantly differed across IPAQ levels (p-value < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between MoCA scores and 'High' and 'Low' (p-value < 0.001) and 'Moderate' and 'Low' (p-value = 0.001) IPAQ levels. Hierarchical regression of potential confounding factors showed that while lower PA, being older, being Malay and hypertension were initially associated with lower MoCA scores, the association was explained by the greater influence of education and savings. Additional research is required to gain a more comprehensive understanding of these relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.