ArticleBritish dental journal2025
Overview of statistics teaching within undergraduate programmes in UK and Ireland dental schools.
Article in British dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Needs Assessment Among Indonesian Dental Schools' Teachers for Teaching Evidence-Based Practice.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Comparison of the teaching effect of problem-based learning and case-based learning teaching methods in dental endodontics education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The United Kingdom (UK) General Dental Council's (GDC's) learning outcomes for undergraduate dental students briefly mention critical appraisal but not statistics. Hence, wide variation in statistics teaching across the dental schools is likely but has not yet been well-documented.Methods A survey was conducted to capture the main features of each of the dental degrees in the 18 UK and Ireland dental schools in terms of statistics-related (standalone or as part of other courses/modules) teaching.Results Representatives from all 18 dental schools completed the survey. There were some similarities, such as most using teaching materials specifically developed for their school, and aiming to teach students to understand/interpret but not generate statistics. However, the number/type of staff delivering the teaching, student contact hours, number of statistical concepts taught, whether statistical theory/formulae/packages were used and inclusion in summative assessments varied extensively. Most reported that this teaching was negatively perceived by the students and many felt that changes were needed.Discussion and conclusion This comprehensive review of undergraduate dental statistics-related provision allows dental schools to compare and contrast their own teaching, which is very timely given the imminent need to implement a new GDC framework. Guidelines to encourage more standardised teaching should be developed to improve the ability of newly qualified dentists to practise evidence-based dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.