Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021870›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2025

Contemporary dental tourism: a review of reporting in the UK news media.

Janine Doughty, Deborah Moore, Matthew Ellis, Jazz Jago, Prasanthi Ananth, Alexander Montasem, Alexander C L Holden, Ilona Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janine DoughtySchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, UK. janineyd@liverpool.ac.uk.
Deborah MoorePublic Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, UK.
Matthew EllisUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Jazz JagoSchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, UK.
Prasanthi AnanthSchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, UK.
Alexander MontasemSchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, UK.
Alexander C L HoldenSydney Dental Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Australia; University of Sydney School of Dentistry, Sydney, Australia.
Ilona JohnsonPublic Health Wales, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The number of people seeking dental tourism increased in recent years and has peaked in popularity with young people following a wave of viral social media content. Dental professionals have expressed their concern about the short- and long-term consequences. This study aimed to explore the contemporary United Kingdom (UK) media narrative toward dental tourism.Methods Newspaper articles were identified using the LexisNexis database. The ten most popular newspapers in the UK were used for the search strategy. Data were analysed using framework analysis. The findings are presented as descriptive and analytical themes.Findings The search strategy identified 201 newspaper articles related to dental tourism. A total of 131 articles were included in the analysis. Five key themes were identified. The themes included: push and pull factors reported to lead to seeking dentistry abroad; patient-reported outcomes and experiences; warnings from dental professionals; amplifying social media hype; and media shaming and stigmatising.Conclusions Social media viral health trends were a means of distributing health (dis/mis)information. The perspectives of social media were amplified by the UK press. Tabloids often stigmatised people who had dentistry abroad.

Indexed as

Dental CareMass MediaMedical TourismNewspapers as TopicSocial MediaHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40021870
PMCPMC11870843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.