Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021815›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Identification of coevolving positions by ancestral reconstruction.

Michael G Nelson, David Talavera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael G NelsonDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2567-2634
David TalaveraDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. David.Talavera@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-3931

Funding

RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/R010900/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coevolution within proteins occurs when changes in one position affect the selective pressure in another position to preserve the protein structure or function. The identification of coevolving positions within proteins remains contentious, with most methods disregarding the phylogenetic information. Here, we present a time-efficient approach for detecting coevolving pairs, which is almost perfect in terms of precision and specificity. It is based on maximum parsimony-based ancestral reconstruction followed by the identification of pairs with a depletion on separate changes when compared to their number of concurrent changes. Our analysis of a previously characterised biological dataset shows that the coevolving pairs that we identified tend to be close in the protein sequence and structure, slightly less solvent exposed and have a higher mutation rate. We also show how the ancestral reconstruction can be used to detect favourable and unfavourable amino acid combinations. Altogether, we demonstrate how this approach is essential for identifying pairs of positions with weak covariation patterns.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProteinsPhylogenyProteins

Identifiers

PMID40021815
PMCPMC11871020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.