ArticleScientific reports2025
Proposing a short version of the Unesp-Botucatu pig acute pain scale using a novel application of machine learning technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical castration of males is carried out on a large scale in the US swine industry and the pain resulting from this procedure can be assessed using the Unesp-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS). We aim to propose a short version of UPAPS based on the behaviors best-ranked by a random forest algorithm. We used behavioral observations from databases of surgically castrated pre-weaned and weaned pigs. We trained a random forest algorithm using the pain-free (pre-castration) and painful (post-castration) conditions as target variable and the 17 UPAPS pain-altered behaviors as feature variables. We ranked the behaviors by their importance in diagnosing pain. The algorithm was refined using a backward step-up procedure, establishing the Short UPAPS. The predictive capacity of the original and short version of the UPAPS was estimated by the area under the curve (AUC). In refinement, the algorithm with the five best-ranked behaviors had the lowest complexity and predictive capacity equivalent to the algorithm with all behaviors. The AUC of Short UPAPS (89.62%) was statistically equivalent (p = 0.6828) to that of UPAPS (90.58%). In conclusion, the proposed Short UPAPS might facilitate the implementation of a standard operating procedure to monitor and diagnose acute pain post-castration in large-scale systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.